One of my YouTube viewers named Mark sent me the following message:
"What I find disturbing is that if I was to approach Source and state that I thought Hitler behaved in an evil way, Source would not only disagree with me but would apparently have no idea of what I was talking about. . . I am happy with the idea of not labeling people as being evil or not evil but it is a whole different ball game to say that some of these acts in themselves are not wrong."
Well, Mark, welcome to my NDE! I understand completely how you feel because I felt the same way when I learned all this information in the afterlife. But I learned something else that helps me understand: there are a million different perspectives in the universe and they are all true for those who hold them, at the time they hold them. For example, human animals have a completely different perspective on life and the afterlife than does Source/God. My writing and talks generally reflect Source or spiritual perspective because that is what I learned in the afterlife. The fact that Source and human perspectives are different, though, does not make either one of them wrong.
Source completely understands humans' beliefs about evil and right and wrong--but does not share that perspective. Nor are we "souls" expected to share Source's perspective while on earth. We share human perspective, which is completely valid while we experience their lives. Humans are judgmental and vindictive. And, just because Source does not judge human behavior at Source's level of existence does not mean we have to accept violence, killing, rape, torture or abuse without judgment at the human level of existence. We who are in humans experience the consequences of violence and have a right to do what we can to prevent it. Punishing offenders is an appropriate control measure. Adopting religious and personal values about right and wrong behavior is also appropriate. But insisting that Source share human judgments is not going to change Source's unconditionally loving and non-judgmental nature. What we can change is our desire to project human nature and beliefs onto Source.
To be clear--Source does NOT say torturing or killing another human, or any act of violence, is "right" or "ok." Source simply does not condemn itself/us for what we do in the physical world-just like you do not condemn yourself for what happens in your own dreams. Do you think you are evil when you hurt someone in a dream? Or have a nightmare full of murder and mayhem? No, because TO YOU it isn't real. You are not the character you portray in your dream; you simply watch the dream through his eyes. The same is true for Source: it/we are not the human characters we portray in physical life. We are parts of Source's own consciousness participating in the manifested world in much the same way you participate in your dreams. My experience of Source convinced me that it is unconditionally loving by nature. That means it loves and accepts us, and the Light Being soul within Hitler, despite what we do in the physical world. Maybe if you think of it as forgiveness, it would help. Source loves us/itself so much it forgives all we do while in human life. That's what unconditional love means.
"I am of course aware that this world is an illusion, which does put a different shade on things. However, the fact that you can't literally kill people doesn't change the fact that you can inflict enormous suffering. Dying might be an illusion but the suffering is not."
Accepting that the manifested world is illusory means you have achieved a spiritual perspective on life. The next step is to understand how that truth affects how we experience this world.
The entire human existence is manifested and "illusory," not just the physical appearances of it. I learned in the afterlife that the suffering isn't "real" either. The emotional experience IS real at the human level, but it is vicarious at our spiritual level. Let me explain. When you watch a particularly important football game, do you get angry with bad calls by the refs, excited by touchdowns, and annoyed by commercial breaks? Are you really angry, excited or annoyed with respect to your own life? No. You are reacting to the game and the emotions fade when the game is over. Similarly, when a woman cries through the ending of a "chick flick," is she actually suffering in her own life? No. She empathized with the fictional characters and forgets all about the crying after the movie ends. In much the same way, we parts of Source inside humans empathize with the lives of our human hosts. We suffer what they suffer--but only while we are in their bodies (and during the short time of the life review). My own experience in the afterlife was that all the pain and suffering I endured in Nanci's body was gone. In fact, Nanci's entire lifetime was revealed to be a vicarious experience, such as we might analogize to having a dream or being in a virtual reality game.
As for suffering with death--that is optional. We Light Being souls can choose to endure it or to get out of the body while it dies. Many near-death experience reports come from people who got out of their bodies to avoid the pain of dying or resuscitation.
The most important point here is that much human suffering could end tomorrow--if we would choose to do it. We Light Being souls have the power to stop our host bodies' hurtful behaviors. Why don't we? Because most people are not aware they even have this option. Most people truly believe they are human and cannot escape human emotions and motivations. That is why it is so important that we awaken each other to our true nature as parts of Source. Once you know that you are a powerful spiritual being, and not a human animal, you can believe you have the power to control your host body's behavior. Expressing more of our spiritual nature through our behavior would increase the amount of unconditional love in our human lives and decrease the violence and abuse.
"What I find disturbing is that if I was to approach Source and state that I thought Hitler behaved in an evil way, Source would not only disagree with me but would apparently have no idea of what I was talking about. . . I am happy with the idea of not labeling people as being evil or not evil but it is a whole different ball game to say that some of these acts in themselves are not wrong."
Well, Mark, welcome to my NDE! I understand completely how you feel because I felt the same way when I learned all this information in the afterlife. But I learned something else that helps me understand: there are a million different perspectives in the universe and they are all true for those who hold them, at the time they hold them. For example, human animals have a completely different perspective on life and the afterlife than does Source/God. My writing and talks generally reflect Source or spiritual perspective because that is what I learned in the afterlife. The fact that Source and human perspectives are different, though, does not make either one of them wrong.
Source completely understands humans' beliefs about evil and right and wrong--but does not share that perspective. Nor are we "souls" expected to share Source's perspective while on earth. We share human perspective, which is completely valid while we experience their lives. Humans are judgmental and vindictive. And, just because Source does not judge human behavior at Source's level of existence does not mean we have to accept violence, killing, rape, torture or abuse without judgment at the human level of existence. We who are in humans experience the consequences of violence and have a right to do what we can to prevent it. Punishing offenders is an appropriate control measure. Adopting religious and personal values about right and wrong behavior is also appropriate. But insisting that Source share human judgments is not going to change Source's unconditionally loving and non-judgmental nature. What we can change is our desire to project human nature and beliefs onto Source.
To be clear--Source does NOT say torturing or killing another human, or any act of violence, is "right" or "ok." Source simply does not condemn itself/us for what we do in the physical world-just like you do not condemn yourself for what happens in your own dreams. Do you think you are evil when you hurt someone in a dream? Or have a nightmare full of murder and mayhem? No, because TO YOU it isn't real. You are not the character you portray in your dream; you simply watch the dream through his eyes. The same is true for Source: it/we are not the human characters we portray in physical life. We are parts of Source's own consciousness participating in the manifested world in much the same way you participate in your dreams. My experience of Source convinced me that it is unconditionally loving by nature. That means it loves and accepts us, and the Light Being soul within Hitler, despite what we do in the physical world. Maybe if you think of it as forgiveness, it would help. Source loves us/itself so much it forgives all we do while in human life. That's what unconditional love means.
"I am of course aware that this world is an illusion, which does put a different shade on things. However, the fact that you can't literally kill people doesn't change the fact that you can inflict enormous suffering. Dying might be an illusion but the suffering is not."
Accepting that the manifested world is illusory means you have achieved a spiritual perspective on life. The next step is to understand how that truth affects how we experience this world.
The entire human existence is manifested and "illusory," not just the physical appearances of it. I learned in the afterlife that the suffering isn't "real" either. The emotional experience IS real at the human level, but it is vicarious at our spiritual level. Let me explain. When you watch a particularly important football game, do you get angry with bad calls by the refs, excited by touchdowns, and annoyed by commercial breaks? Are you really angry, excited or annoyed with respect to your own life? No. You are reacting to the game and the emotions fade when the game is over. Similarly, when a woman cries through the ending of a "chick flick," is she actually suffering in her own life? No. She empathized with the fictional characters and forgets all about the crying after the movie ends. In much the same way, we parts of Source inside humans empathize with the lives of our human hosts. We suffer what they suffer--but only while we are in their bodies (and during the short time of the life review). My own experience in the afterlife was that all the pain and suffering I endured in Nanci's body was gone. In fact, Nanci's entire lifetime was revealed to be a vicarious experience, such as we might analogize to having a dream or being in a virtual reality game.
As for suffering with death--that is optional. We Light Being souls can choose to endure it or to get out of the body while it dies. Many near-death experience reports come from people who got out of their bodies to avoid the pain of dying or resuscitation.
The most important point here is that much human suffering could end tomorrow--if we would choose to do it. We Light Being souls have the power to stop our host bodies' hurtful behaviors. Why don't we? Because most people are not aware they even have this option. Most people truly believe they are human and cannot escape human emotions and motivations. That is why it is so important that we awaken each other to our true nature as parts of Source. Once you know that you are a powerful spiritual being, and not a human animal, you can believe you have the power to control your host body's behavior. Expressing more of our spiritual nature through our behavior would increase the amount of unconditional love in our human lives and decrease the violence and abuse.